American Journal of Therapeutics 31(2):p e133-e140, March/April 2024.
Cherian, Kirsten PhD1; Shinozuka, Kenneth BA2,3,*; Tabaac, Burton J. MD, FAHA4,5; Arenas, Alejandro MD6; Beutler, Bryce D. MD7; Evans, Viviana D. BA8; Fasano, Chelsey BA9; Muir, Owen S. MD, DFAACAP10,11
Background:
Ibogaine is a plant-derived alkaloid that has been used for thousands of years in rites of passage and spiritual ceremonies in West-Central Africa. In the West, it has primarily been used and studied for its anti-addictive properties and more recently for other neuropsychiatric indications, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, and traumatic brain injury.
Areas of Uncertainty:
Ibogaine requires careful patient screening and monitoring because of significant safety issues. There is potential for cardiotoxicity (prolonged QT interval); without rigorous screening, fatal arrhythmias may occur. However, preliminary research suggests that co-administration of ibogaine with magnesium may mitigate cardiotoxicity. Additionally, ibogaine may have dangerous interactions with opiates, so patients who receive ibogaine treatment for opioid use disorder must withdraw from long-acting opioids. Other potential concerning effects of ibogaine include rare incidences of mania or psychosis. Anticipated transient effects during ibogaine treatment can include ataxia, tremors, and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Therapeutic Advances:
Robust effects after a single treatment with ibogaine have been reported. In open-label and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), ibogaine reduces heroin and opioid cravings by upwards of 50%, up to 24 weeks after the treatment. An observational study of 30 Special Operations Forces veterans with mild traumatic brain injury reported that 86% were in remission from post-traumatic stress disorder, 83% from depression, and 83% from anxiety, one month after a single-dose ibogaine treatment.
Limitations:
Although there are several observational and open-label studies, there is only a single double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT on ibogaine. More RCTs with large sample sizes must be conducted to support ibogaine’s safety and efficacy.
Conclusions:
Given the promising preliminary findings, ibogaine could potentially fill a much-needed gap in treatments for challenging conditions, including opioid dependence. Ibogaine’s remarkable effects in traditionally treatment-resistant, combat-exposed individuals hints at its potential in broader populations with physical and psychological trauma.
CLINICAL CASE
A 56-year-old Navy Seal Veteran Explosives Ordnance Disposal specialist with multiple mild traumatic brain injuries (TBI) from combat and blasts, and multiple physical injuries including fractured thoracic vertebrae with an intact spinal cord presented for treatment. He was honorably discharged after 25 years of service and 9 combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and polysubstance abuse including alcohol, Vicodin, and Adderall. He suffers from physical pain, headaches, and poor sleep. He is separated from his wife of 24 years and has 2 sons, ages 19 and 23 years, from whom he is estranged. Family relationships have deteriorated because of his anger. He has participated in residential treatment for PTSD and substance use disorder 3 times. He was unable to tolerate cognitive processing therapy or exposure therapy for PTSD. He has made 5 suicide attempts. He has not been able to stop abusing substances, self-medicating unmanaged symptoms. He is taking Prazosin (20 mg every night and 5 mg every morning) to help with nightmares and hyperarousal. He has tried several antidepressants without good effect, including 80 mg of Prozac, 250 mg of Zoloft, 30 mg of Lexapro, and 40 mg of Viibryd. He was able to tolerate each medication only up to 3 months before discontinuation because of lack of efficacy and intolerable side effects at their terminal doses. He admits also that he has not been compliant with medications. He is unable to work, is socially isolated with only sporadic contact with former Navy SEAL teammates despite their attempts to support him, and is at risk of homelessness. He continues to struggle with significant suicidal ideation.
BACKGROUND
History
Ibogaine is an oneirogen—from the Greek words óneiros (“dream”) and gen (“to create”)—alkaloid typically derived from the root bark of the Tabernanthe iboga or the Voacanga africana plants.2,4 The root bark of the iboga tree, which is native to the west coast of central Africa, has a long history of use in spiritual, medicinal, and rite of passage ceremonies in the Bwiti spiritual tradition of Gabon and Cameroon.5 The first documented use of iboga in the West was by French explorers in the late 1800s. In the mid-20th century, it was used in France as an antidepressant and stimulant called Lambarène before becoming illegal there.5 During this time, ibogaine was also gaining attention for its potential to treat addictions.2,6,7
Chemistry and mechanism of action
Ibogaine’s chemical structure consists of a complex tricyclic indole molecule with an isoquinuclidine moiety. The molecule contains a nitrogen atom that is able to form hydrogen bonds and act as a proton acceptor, contributing to its ability to interact with various neurotransmitter receptors in the brain.8
Ibogaine is metabolized through O-demethylation by cytochrome CYP2D6 enzymes in the gut wall and liver.9–11 This O-demethylation produces ibogaine’s primary metabolite, noribogaine. Although ibogaine’s plasma half-life is 4–7 hours, noribogaine’s is as long as 28–49 hours.3,12 Noribogaine is subsequently converted to noribogaine glucuronides.12 In rats, 30%–40% of ibogaine is detected unchanged in urine and feces 24 hours after administration.13 The large amount of unmetabolized ibogaine indicates that it is slowly released. This may be attributed to its storage in fatty tissue, which results from ibogaine’s lipophilicity.14,15
Unlike LSD, N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), and psilocybin, ibogaine is not a classical psychedelic, so the 5-HT2A receptor does not play a significant role in its mechanism of action. Ibogaine has high affinity for κ-opioid, μ-opioid, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA), and sigma-2 receptors, and it also inhibits voltage-gated ion channels.6,7,16–20 Sigma receptors are a hypothesized active site for other neuropsychiatric agents, including fluvoxamine21,22 and DMT (see the “DMT and Ayahuasca” chapter of this special edition). Ibogaine’s NMDA antagonism and κ-opioid agonism may mediate its efficacy for treating substance use disorder and withdrawal.6,23,24 NMDA binds glutamate, which plays a crucial role in the expression of addiction-related behaviors.25,26 Additionally, in animal models, κ-opioid receptors play a role in stress-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behaviors.27 Ibogaine is also thought to have an effect on the expression of various neurotrophic factors (NFs) including brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial-derived neurotrophic factor, which may further contribute to the enduring anti-addictive and antidepressant properties of ibogaine.17,28 Additionally, ibogaine has been found to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects.29
PTSD in veterans
Ibogaine shows promise for treating PTSD in veterans. The intensity of combat deployments, exposure to repeated blasts, exposure to repeated traumatic events, and high risk of injury all contribute to a complex of diagnoses with overlapping symptoms that can be refractory to treatment.30 Treatment resistance, stigma related to seeking help within this population,31 and dropout rates as high as 39% with conventional exposure-based treatments32 can contribute to the development of substance use disorders, which arise from a desire to self-medicate, and suicidal ideation, further complicating the symptom presentation and treatment efficacy. Veteran suicide rates are approximately 1.5 times the rate of non-veterans, with up to 30% of suicides related to substance use.33
AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY
Ibogaine carries a much higher risk of fatality than classical psychedelics; a total of 33 ibogaine-related deaths have been publicly reported.6,7,34,35 The majority of the health and safety risks of ibogaine can be attributed to its cardiotoxicity (for an extensive review, see Ref. 3). Ibogaine may prolong the QT interval of the heart and subsequently induce life-threatening Torsades de Pointes arrhythmia.20,34,36–38 The underlying mechanism may be ibogaine’s inhibition of human ether-à-go-go Related Gene (hERG) potassium channels, which play a crucial role in mediating the repolarization of the cardiac action potential.39,40 Lengthening the action potential in ventricular cells subsequently extends the QT interval.41,42 In general, blockage of hERG channels is a primary contributor to drug-induced QT interval prolongation.3
Prolonged baseline QT interval, which can be induced by common medications such as antibiotics and antidepressants,43 and hERG mutations associated with long-QT syndrome44 are therefore risk factors for consuming ibogaine. Other preexisting cardiovascular conditions may heighten the risk of fatality. In a review of 19 fatalities associated with ibogaine use, 6 of the cases had preexisting heart conditions, such as coronary artery sclerosis, hypertension, myocardial infarct, cardiac hypertrophy, and dilated cardiomyopathy.45 However, another review identified eight cases, including one fatality, in which cardiac abnormalities such as ventricular tachyarrhythmias and prolonged QT intervals occurred during ibogaine treatment, despite no preexisting cardiovascular conditions or family history.6
However, a recent observational study demonstrated that coadministration of magnesium with ibogaine may reduce the risk of cardiotoxicity.46 Here, 30 Special Operations Forces veterans (SFVs) with mild traumatic brain injury sought out ibogaine therapy at a clinic in Mexico for various functional limitations and psychiatric symptoms. There were no instances of clinically meaningful QT prolongation, bradycardia (slow heart rate), tachycardia (fast heart rate), or hemodynamic instability. Additionally, no serious treatment-emergent adverse effects were reported. Magnesium depletion causes mitochondria in the heart to swell because of sodium influx and potassium efflux, which leads to the death of myocardial fibres.47 Therefore, magnesium supplementation in the past has been shown to reduce the QT interval.48
Fatalities have also happened when ibogaine users were concurrently addicted to multiple drugs, such as cocaine, alcohol, and methamphetamine, while also abusing heroin, for which they were seeking treatment.45 Ibogaine can potentiate the analgesic effects of opioids, which increases the risk of overdose.49 Additionally, some opioids such as methadone inhibit CYP2D6, the enzyme that metabolizes ibogaine.50 (Thus, independently of substance use disorders, poor inhibition of CYP2D6 may also be a risk factor for ibogaine treatment.) Therefore, appropriate precautions must be taken to mitigate the risk of fatality during ibogaine treatment for opiate use disorder. Certain opioids that are used to commonly facilitate withdrawal from heroin are long-acting; for instance, methadone can have a half-life as long as 46 hours.51 It is crucial to ensure that these long-acting opioids are no longer present in the plasma before a patient begins ibogaine treatment, so clinicians recommend switching to short-acting opioids up to two weeks in advance.49,52 Clinicians advise against tapering other medications, such as benzodiazepines.49 (It is important to note that there are currently no FDA-approved guidelines for the screening, administration, and monitoring of ibogaine treatment.)
Although there was one fatality in an FDA-approved clinical trial in the mid-1990s, most open-label trials, RCTs, and other studies conducted on humans since then have not reported any serious adverse events, let alone fatalities.1,8,9,11,12,53–55 One observational study published in 2017 reported one fatality among 15 participants, which was ruled to be the result of a breach in the treatment provider’s duty of care.29 When ibogaine providers diligently follow health and safety protocols, the likelihood of fatality seems to be low.
Even with proper medical care, however, ibogaine does cause transient ataxia and tremors. In one study on ibogaine for treating opioid use disorder, ataxia was observed in all 14 participants; however, the ataxia fully subsided within 24 hours for all participants.56 Conditions that are associated with motor impairments, such as Parkinson’s disease or multiple sclerosis, may be contraindications for ibogaine treatment, although this has yet to be investigated in a study. Other potential adverse effects include psychosis; one review reported 3 cases of mania after ibogaine use, but it is important to note that they all occurred in unregulated settings, where providers may not have been following established protocols.57
There has been mixed evidence of neurotoxicity in animal and human research on ibogaine.6 Initial research suggested that ibogaine, by stimulating the inferior olivary nucleus in the medulla oblongata,58 causes Purkinje cells in the rat cerebellum to degenerate,59 perhaps explaining long-term motor deficits in these rats. However, the dose used in this study (100–300 mg/kg) was much higher than the typical therapeutic dose of ibogaine (6–30 mg/kg).20 A lower dose of 40 mg/kg did not cause Purkinje cells to degenerate.60 In humans, there are no records of cerebellar or Purkinje cell damage after ibogaine use, even among fatalities.61
In efforts to improve the toxicity of ibogaine, use has been made of alternatives like noribogaine, a metabolite of ibogaine and the synthetic compounds 18-MC and Tabernanthalog. None of these alternatives are psychoactive. Noribogaine is unlikely to be less cardiotoxic than ibogaine, given that fatalities tend to occur 24–76 hours after the consumption of ibogaine and the half-life of noribogaine is on a similar timescale.3,12 Preliminary evidence shows that 18-MC does not slow down heart rate, induce tremors, or damage the cerebellum, even at high doses, in rats.62 However, more research is needed. In rodent studies, Tabernanthalog has exhibited anti-addictive and antidepressant effects and neuroplastic changes, and it seems to have lower potential for cardiotoxicity than ibogaine because it is 100-fold less potent at inhibiting hERG channels.63,64
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES
Most of the clinical research on ibogaine to date has focused on its anti-addictive properties, which have proven useful for treating opioid use disorder (OUD) and cocaine use disorder. (Abuse of ibogaine itself is not a concern.3) Animal studies suggest that ibogaine significantly reduces the severity of withdrawal symptoms from opioids and decreases opioid and cocaine self-administration.17,18
In humans, there has been one double-blind RCT (Table 1) and at least six observational studies that reported changes in OUD or cocaine use disorder symptoms from ibogaine treatment, and a number of retrospective surveys and case reports (see Ref. 65 for a systematic review). The first observational study examined 27 opioid- and/or cocaine-dependent participants in an ibogaine treatment clinic in St. Kitts and found that ibogaine significantly reduced opioid cravings. Thirty six hours after treatment, desire and intention to use opioids decreased by 53.1% and 51.8%, respectively, as measured by the Heroin Craving Questionnaire (HCQ-29).53 However, there was no significant effect of ibogaine on desire or intention to use cocaine, as determined by the Cocaine Craving Questionnaire (CCQ-29). An observational case series of 191 participants in the same clinic determined that ibogaine significantly diminished multiple dimensions of heroin craving, as measured by the HCQ-29 scale. In particular, one month after treatment, desire or intention to use opioids decreased by 50.2%.54 Unlike in the previous, smaller study, ibogaine brought about a significant, 39.6% reduction CCQ-29 ratings of desire or intent to use cocaine. The only RCT to date, in which 10 participants received the ibogaine treatment and 10 others were assigned placebo, demonstrated a significant 64.9% reduction in cocaine cravings 24 weeks after the treatment, according to ratings on the Minnesota Cocaine Craving Scale (MCCS).1 In other observational studies, ibogaine not only reduced cravings but also caused people to abstain from opiates. One such study on 14 opiate addicts found that all but 2 participants (85.7%) tested negative for opioids at a 6-month follow-up.29 In another study on 30 participants who received ibogaine treatment at a different site, 50% were abstinent from heroin at a one-month follow-up.52
Table 1. – Contemporary (21st-century) clinical trials on ibogaine.
Study | Type | Dosing | Sample | Findings |
1 | Double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT | 1800 mg of ibogaine (dried extract) | 20 people with cocaine dependence | Significant reduction in cocaine cravings between placebo and ibogaine group at 72 hours (MD in MCCS scores: −5.6) and at 24 weeks (MD in MCCS scores: −4.1) |
The observational studies suggest that ibogaine is potentially far superior to the available treatments for OUD. In a systematic review of buprenorphine maintenance therapy, which is one of the preferred treatments for OUD in the United States, only 18% of participants across studies were abstinent after one month, and relapse rates exceeded 50% in all studies.66 Another systematic review of tapered methadone treatment revealed that only 25% of participants on average abstain from opiates at a mean follow-up time of 1.5 months.67
Ibogaine is also highly effective for managing opioid withdrawal symptoms. One observational study on 50 OUD patients reported that 78% of participants did not exhibit objective signs of opioid withdrawal 48 hours after ibogaine treatment.68 In other observational studies, significant reductions in self-reported withdrawal symptoms ranged from 54.8% to ∼66%, up to nine days after the ibogaine treatment.9,29,52,68
One RCT in 27 participants investigated noribogaine, ibogaine’s primary metabolite, which, as stated above, is not psychoactive.8 The primary aim of the RCT was to establish the safety and tolerability of noribogaine treatment. Noribogaine did not result in significant improvements in opioid withdrawal symptoms and cravings.
Ibogaine may also be effective for treating PTSD and other associated conditions, such as depression and alcohol use disorder.69–71 Robust findings have been reported in observational studies of SFVs with combat-related PTSD symptoms and symptoms of traumatic brain injury, including subjective cognitive complaints. A retrospective survey of 65 SFVs who received combined ibogaine and 5-MeO-DMT therapy (each drug was administered once, in two sessions separated by two days) at a psychedelic clinic in Mexico found that the treatment significantly decreased symptoms of PTSD (d = 3.6), depression (d = 3.7), and cognitive impairment (d = 2.8).71 Ibogaine is also associated with significant decreases in suicidal ideation (d = 1.9). This result is especially important given that suicidality is significantly higher in veterans than in the general population.33, p. 202 However, because the survey by Köck et al65 is purely retrospective, participants may have overestimated their symptoms before receiving the treatment. A subsequent observational study of 86 SFVs at the same clinic, which conducted both pretreatment and posttreatment measurements, showed that the same combined ibogaine + 5-MeO-DMT treatment significantly reduced self-reported PTSD (d = 0.414) and depression symptoms (d = 0.275).69 In the same study, a subgroup of 45 participants initially met criteria for risky alcohol use. One month after the combined treatment, 24% were abstinent, and 33% became nonrisky drinkers; after 6 months, 16% were abstinent, and 31% were nonrisky drinkers.70 Finally, the most recent observational study of 30 SFVs, which was discussed above, coadministered ibogaine with magnesium to reduce cardiotoxicity.46 Immediately after treatment, total scores on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) decreased significantly by 10.3 points (d = 0.74, P < 0.001). That is, participants improved from mild-to-moderate disability to borderline no-to-mild disability. One month after treatment, participants experienced a further mean decline of 14.8 points in WHODAS-2.0 scores, such that most participants had no disability. Significant decreases in ratings of PTSD, depression, and anxiety were also reported, both immediately and 1 month after treatment, with d > 2 in all cases. Remarkably, at 1 month, 86% of participants were in remission from PTSD (total Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale-5 [CAPS-5] score <12), 83% in remission from depression (total Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score <8), and 83% in remission from anxiety (total Hamilton-Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A] score <8).
CONCLUSIONS
Originating from West Central Africa as a sacrament for spiritual rituals and rites of passage, ibogaine has gained appreciation in the West as a powerful antidote for opiate addiction and, more recently, TBI and PTSD. Observational studies have shown that ibogaine is promising for treating these conditions. However, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs with large sample sizes have yet to be conducted. Compared even to other psychedelics, research on ibogaine is still in its infancy. Although ibogaine initially raised concerns because of fatalities arising from cardiotoxicity and interactions with opiates, recent clinical research suggests that fatalities can be avoided with careful screening and monitoring of participants. That being said, formal clinical practices should be developed to further improve patient safety.65 These should include guidance for proper and thorough patient screening, management of drug interactions, appropriate monitoring throughout treatment, dosing, caution regarding potential co-administrations and co-therapies, and ibogaine supply and purity oversight.2,34
We conclude by noting that the recreational use of iboga has fueled rampant trafficking of the iboga root,72 and Western medicalization of iboga may lead to further endangerment of the plant and appropriation of African cultural practices. The Gabonese people have made efforts to address these concerns through the adoption of the Nagoya Protocol, an international treaty implemented in 2014.73 The intention of this protocol is to promote sustainable growth of iboga and harvesting practices in which funding flows back to the communities that produce this valuable resource.73,74 At this time, however, participation in this treaty is voluntary. Current laws around psychedelic research and use have the potential to impact traditional uses of psychedelic medicines in unintended ways. Work led by indigenous communities is currently underway to develop ethical practices to respect and include indigenous traditions and communities, acknowledge traditional practices, and ensure ethical and responsible resource access and management.75
REFERENCES
1. Prior P, Prior S. Ibogaine effect on cocaine craving and use in dependent patients -A double- blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. J Addict Ther. 2014;1:003.
2. Bouso JC, Fornís I, Vilamala MV, et al. An analytical study of iboga alkaloids contained in Tabernanthe iboga-derived products offered by ibogaine treatment providers. Arch Clin Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2020;47:51–54.
3. Koenig X, Hilber K. The anti-addiction drug ibogaine and the heart: a delicate relation. Molecules. 2015;20:2208–2228.
4. Kombian SB, Saleh TM, Fiagbe NI, et al. Ibogaine and a total alkaloidal extract of Voacanga africana modulate neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission in the rat parabrachial nucleus in vitro. Brain Res Bull. 1997;44:603–610.
5. Alper KR. Ibogaine: a review. Alkaloids Chem Biol. 2001;56:1–38.
6. Litjens RPW, Brunt TM. How toxic is ibogaine? Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2016;54:297–302.
7. Mash DC. Iuphar—invited review—ibogaine—A legacy within the current renaissance of psychedelic therapy. Pharmacol Res. 2023;190:106620.
8. Glue P, Cape G, Tunnicliff D, et al. Ascending single-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety study of noribogaine in opioid-dependent patients. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2016;5:460–468.
9. Mash DC, Kovera CA, Pablo J, et al. Ibogaine in the treatment of heroin withdrawal. Alkaloids Chem Biol. 2001;56:155–171.
10. Obach RS, Pablo J, Mash DC. Cytochrome P4502D6 catalyzes the O-demethylation of the psychoactive alkaloid ibogaine to 12-hydroxyibogamine. Drug Metab Dispos. 1998;26:764–768.
11. Glue P, Winter H, Garbe K, et al. Influence of CYP2D6 activity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single 20 mg dose of ibogaine in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;55:680–687.
12. Glue P, Lockhart M, Lam F, et al. Ascending-dose study of noribogaine in healthy volunteers: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;55:189–194.
13. Maciulaitis R, Kontrimaviciute V, Bressolle FMM, et al. Ibogaine, an anti-addictive drug: pharmacology and time to go further in development. A narrative review. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008;27:181–194.
14. Hough LB, Pearl SM, Glick SD. Tissue distribution of ibogaine after intraperitoneal and subcutaneous administration. Life Sci. 1996;58:PL119–122.
15. Martins MLF, Heydari P, Li W, et al. Drug transporters ABCB1 (P-gp) and OATP, but not drug-metabolizing enzyme CYP3A4, affect the pharmacokinetics of the psychoactive alkaloid ibogaine and its metabolites. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:855000.
16. Bowen WD. Sigma receptors: recent advances and new clinical potentials. Pharmaceutica Acta Helv. 2000;74:211–218.
17. dos Santos RG, Bouso JC, Hallak JEC. The antiaddictive effects of ibogaine: a systematic literature review of human studies. J Psychedelic Stud. 2017;1:20–28.
18. Glick SD, Rossman K, Rao NC, et al. Effects of ibogaine on acute signs of morphine withdrawal in rats: independence from tremor. Neuropharmacology. 1992;31:497–500.
19. Popik P, Skolnick P. Chapter 3: pharmacology of ibogaine and ibogaine-related alkaloids. In: Cordell GA, ed. The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Biology. Vol 52. Academic Press; 1999:197–231.
20. Schep LJ, Slaughter RJ, Galea S, et al. Ibogaine for treating drug dependence. What is a safe dose? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;166:1–5.
21. Narita N, Hashimoto K, Tomitaka S, et al. Interactions of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with subtypes of sigma receptors in rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1996;307:117–119.
22. Sukhatme VP, Reiersen AM, Vayttaden SJ, et al. Fluvoxamine: a review of its mechanism of action and its role in COVID-19. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:652688.
23. Sershen H, Hashim A, Lajtha A. The effect of ibogaine on kappa-opioid- and 5-HT3-induced changes in stimulation-evoked dopamine release in vitro from striatum of C57BL/6By mice. Brain Res Bull. 1995;36:587–591.
24. Trujillo KA, Akil H. Inhibition of morphine tolerance and dependence by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801. Science. 1991;251:85–87.
25. Kalivas PW, LaLumiere R, Knackstedt L, et al. Glutamate transmission in addiction. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56(suppl 1):169–173.
26. Tomek SE, LaCrosse AL, Nemirovsky NE, et al. NMDA receptor modulators in the treatment of drug addiction. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013;6:251–268.
27. Lalanne L, Ayranci G, Kieffer BL, et al. The kappa opioid receptor: from addiction to depression, and back. Front Psychiatry. 2014;5:170.
28. Marton S, González B, Rodríguez-Bottero S, et al. Ibogaine administration modifies GDNF and BDNF expression in brain regions involved in mesocorticolimbic and nigral dopaminergic circuits. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:193.
29. Noller GE, Frampton CM, Yazar-Klosinski B. Ibogaine treatment outcomes for opioid dependence from a twelve-month follow-up observational study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2018;44:37–46.
30. Frueh BC, Madan A, Fowler JC, et al. “Operator syndrome”: a unique constellation of medical and behavioral health-care needs of military special operation forces. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2020;55:281–295.
31. Hing M, Cabrera J, Barstow C, et al. Special operations forces and incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. J Spec Oper Med. 2012;12:23–35.
32. Steenkamp MM, Litz BT, Hoge CW, et al. Psychotherapy for military-related PTSD: a review of randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 2015;314:489–500.
33. Inoue C, Shawler E, Jordan CH, et al. Veteran and military mental health issues. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
34. Ona G, Rocha JM, Bouso JC, et al. The adverse events of ibogaine in humans: an updated systematic review of the literature (2015–2020). Psychopharmacology. 2022;239:1977–1987.
35. Luz M, Mash DC. Evaluating the toxicity and therapeutic potential of ibogaine in the treatment of chronic opioid abuse. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2021;17:1019–1022.
36. Hildyard C, Macklin P, Prendergast B, et al. A case of QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes caused by ibogaine toxicity. J Emerg Med. 2016;50:e83–e87.
37. Hoelen DWM, Spiering W, Valk GD. Long-QT syndrome induced by the antiaddiction drug ibogaine. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:308–309.
38. Pleskovic A, Gorjup V, Brvar M, et al. Ibogaine-associated ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Clin Toxicol. 2012;50:157.
39. Koenig X, Kovar M, Rubi L, et al. Anti-addiction drug ibogaine inhibits voltage-gated ionic currents: a study to assess the drug’s cardiac ion channel profile. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013;273:259–268.
40. Thurner P, Stary-Weinzinger A, Gafar H, et al. Mechanism of hERG channel block by the psychoactive indole alkaloid ibogaine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014;348:346–358.
41. Redfern WS, Carlsson L, Davis AS, et al. Relationships between preclinical cardiac electrophysiology, clinical QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes for a broad range of drugs: evidence for a provisional safety margin in drug development. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;58:32–45.
42. Sanguinetti MC, Tristani-Firouzi M. hERG potassium channels and cardiac arrhythmia. Nature. 2006;440:463–469.
43. Farzam K, Tivakaran VS. QT prolonging drugs. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
44. Li G, Shi R, Wu J, et al. Association of the hERG mutation with long-QT syndrome type 2, syncope and epilepsy. Mol Med Rep. 2016;13:2467–2475.
45. Alper KR, Stajić M, Gill JR. Fatalities temporally associated with the ingestion of ibogaine. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57:398–412.
46. Cherian KN, Keynan JN, Anker L, et al. Magnesium–ibogaine therapy in veterans with traumatic brain injuries. Nat Med. 2024;1:1–9.
47. Krasner BS. Cardiac effects of magnesium with special reference to anaesthesia: a review. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1979;26:181–185.
48. Krasner BS, Girdwood R, Smith H. The effect of slow releasing oral magnesium chloride on the qtc interval of the electrocardiogram during open heart surgery. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1981;28:329–333.
49. Dickinson J, et al. Clinical Guidelines for Ibogaine-assisted Detoxification. IBOGAINE SAFETY GUIDELINES. Available at: https://ibogaineguidelines.com/. Accessed December 10, 2023.
50. Coller JK, Michalakas JR, James HM, et al. Inhibition of CYP2D6-mediated tramadol O-demethylation in methadone but not buprenorphine maintenance patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;74:835–841.
51. Wolff K, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Shires S, et al. The pharmacokinetics of methadone in healthy subjects and opiate users. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;44:325–334.
52. Brown TK, Alper K. Treatment of opioid use disorder with ibogaine: detoxification and drug use outcomes. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2018;44:24–36.
53. Mash DC, Kovera CA, Pablo J, et al. Ibogaine: complex pharmacokinetics, concerns for safety, and preliminary efficacy measures. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;914:394–401.
54. Mash DC, Duque L, Page B, et al. Ibogaine detoxification transitions opioid and cocaine abusers between dependence and abstinence: clinical observations and treatment outcomes. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:529.
55. Forsyth B, Machado L, Jowett T, et al. Effects of low dose ibogaine on subjective mood state and psychological performance. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;189:10–13.
56. Knuijver T, Schellekens A, Belgers M, et al. Safety of ibogaine administration in detoxification of opioid-dependent individuals: a descriptive open-label observational study. Addiction. 2022;117:118–128.
57. Marta CJ, Ryan WC, Kopelowicz A, et al. Mania following use of ibogaine: a case series. The Am J Addict. 2015;24:203–205.
58. O’Hearn E, Molliver ME. The olivocerebellar projection mediates ibogaine-induced degeneration of Purkinje cells: a model of indirect, trans-synaptic excitotoxicity. J Neurosci. 1997;17:8828–8841.
59. O’Hearn E, Molliver ME. Degeneration of Purkinje cells in parasagittal zones of the cerebellar vermis after treatment with ibogaine or harmaline. Neuroscience. 1993;55:303–310.
60. Molinari HH, Maisonneuve IM, Glick SD. Ibogaine neurotoxicity: a re-evaluation. Brain Res. 1996;737:255–262.
61. Mash DC, Kovera CA, Buck BE, et al. Medication development of ibogaine as a pharmacotherapy for drug dependence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;844:274–292.
62. Glick SD, Maisonneuve IM, Szumlinski KK. 18-Methoxycoronaridine (18-MC) and ibogaine: comparison of antiaddictive efficacy, toxicity, and mechanisms of action. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;914:369–386.
63. Cameron LP, Tombari RJ, Lu J, et al. A non-hallucinogenic psychedelic analogue with therapeutic potential. Nature. 2021;589:474–479.
64. Heinsbroek JA, Giannotti G, Bonilla J, et al. Tabernanthalog reduces motivation for heroin and alcohol in a polydrug use model. Psychedelic Med. 2023;1:111–119.
65. Köck P, Froelich K, Walter M, et al. A systematic literature review of clinical trials and therapeutic applications of ibogaine. J Substance Abuse Treat. 2022;138:108717.
66. Bentzley BS, Barth KS, Back SE, et al. Discontinuation of buprenorphine maintenance therapy: perspectives and outcomes. J Substance Abuse Treat. 2015;52:48–57.
67. Amato L, Davoli M, Minozzi S, et al. Methadone at tapered doses for the management of opioid withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:CD003409.
68. Malcolm BJ, Polanco M, Barsuglia JP. Changes in withdrawal and craving scores in participants undergoing opioid detoxification utilizing ibogaine. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2018;50:256–265.
69. Davis AK, Xin Y, Sepeda N, et al. Open-label study of consecutive ibogaine and 5-MeO-DMT assisted-therapy for trauma-exposed male Special Operations Forces Veterans: prospective data from a clinical program in Mexico. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2023;49:587–596.
70. Armstrong SB, Xin Y, Sepeda ND, et al. Prospective associations of psychedelic treatment for co-occurring alcohol misuse and posttraumatic stress symptoms among United States Special Operations Forces Veterans. Mil Psychol. 2023;1–8.
71. Davis AK, Averill LA, Sepeda ND, et al. Psychedelic treatment for trauma-related psychological and cognitive impairment among US special operations forces veterans. Chronic Stress. 2020;4:2470547020939564.
72. ENACT. Illicit trafficking of natural psychotropics from Gabon: special focus on Iboga | ENACT Africa. Available at: https://enactafrica.org. Accessed December 10, 2023.
73. Polit M, Friso F, Mabit J. Plant based assisted therapy for the treatment of substance use disorders part 2: beyond blurred boundaries. Cultura y Droga. 2019;24:19–42.
74. Overmann J, Scholz AH. Microbiological research under the Nagoya protocol: facts and fiction. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:85–88.
75. Celidwen Y, Redvers N, Githaiga C, et al. Ethical principles of traditional Indigenous medicine to guide western psychedelic research and practice. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023;18:100410.